AI interpretability

Enhancing AI Interpretability for Better Business Outcomes

Imagine a bustling tech startup on the brink of revolutionizing the healthcare industry with an advanced AI system. The team is excited, believing they have the solution to predict and prevent diseases. However, as they launch their AI-driven product, they face a critical question: How can they ensure users trust their AI predictions through AI interpretability?

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning technologies are rapidly shaping the future of business, promising to solve complex problems and generate significant economic benefits. For instance, AI has been credited with increasing operational efficiency by up to 40% in certain industries. But there’s a catch. When these powerful systems lack interpretability, often referred to as explainability, they can turn from a boon to a bane. A recent study found that up to 30% of AI projects fail due to trust issues and lack of transparency.

What happens when a hospital’s AI system predicts patient outcomes without explaining the reasoning? How do finance companies ensure their AI models are making ethical and accurate decisions? This article delves into the critical need for AI interpretability, the challenges it presents, and the benefits it offers to businesses, ensuring that AI remains a tool for innovation rather than a source of risk.

Read More: Black Box Machine Learning in Fraud Prevention

The Black Box Phenomenon in AI

AI systems are often perceived as black boxes, meaning their internal workings are not visible to end users. These systems take information and parameters as inputs, perform calculations in an opaque manner, and produce outputs that may be difficult to understand. This lack of transparency can lead to several issues:

  • Unrealistic expectations about AI capabilities.
  • Poorly informed decision-making.
  • A lack of trust in AI systems.

These issues can significantly hinder the adoption of AI across an organization and may even lead to the failure of AI projects. A survey by IDC revealed that many global organizations experience failures in their AI initiatives, with up to 50 percent failure rates in some cases. The black box phenomenon and interpretability challenges are often cited as key contributing factors.

The Consequences of Poor Interpretability

When AI systems are not interpretable, the potential for negative consequences increases. For example, poor interpretability can result in misguided business decisions that adversely affect end users. Organizations often place significant trust in AI to drive business decisions, such as predicting equipment failures, optimizing supply chains, and detecting fraud. However, if these AI systems are not interpretable, they can lead to outcomes that are not aligned with business objectives or user needs.

Poor interpretability can also result in unrealistic expectations about what AI can achieve. When end users do not understand how AI systems arrive at their conclusions, they may either overestimate or underestimate the system’s capabilities. This misalignment can lead to poor decision-making and a lack of trust in AI, ultimately jeopardizing its implementation.

Benefits of Interpretable AI

  • Interpretable AI offers several benefits that can help mitigate the risks associated with the black box phenomenon. Firstly, interpretability provides clarity by shedding light on the inner workings of AI systems. This transparency allows users to understand how decisions are made and whether the AI is functioning as intended.
  • Interpretability is crucial for building trust. When users can see the logical relationships between input data and AI-generated predictions, they are more likely to trust the system. This trust is essential for successful change management and user adoption of AI technologies.
  • Interpretable AI can generate new insights by identifying patterns and relationships that may not be immediately apparent to human analysts. This capability was demonstrated by AlphaGo, which showcased new strategies in the game of Go that players are now adopting.
  • Interpretability is a key component of ethical AI. It ensures that AI systems can be audited and that their decisions can be traced. This auditability is crucial for avoiding legal and ethical issues that can arise from opaque AI systems.

Key Issues Addressed by Interpretable AI

Interpretable AI helps address several critical issues that can arise in the deployment of AI systems:

  • Ensuring the system is learning the correct objective.
  • Building trust in the AI system.
  • Generating new insights.
  • Ensuring the system is ethical.

For instance, interpretability is essential for ensuring that AI systems are aligned with correct business objectives. If an AI system is trained on poorly defined objectives, it may produce unwanted outcomes. An example of this is an AI system designed to decelerate fighter jets, which learned to maximize landing force instead of optimizing for safety. Interpretability allowed researchers to identify and correct this issue.

Trustworthiness is another critical aspect. Users need to understand how AI systems establish relationships between input data and predictions. For example, in healthcare, an interpretable AI model identified an incorrect correlation between asthma and lower pneumonia risk, leading to improvements in the model.

Intelligible models can also bring new insights. AlphaGo’s success in Go tournaments demonstrated how AI can uncover new strategies. Interpretability helps explain these strategies, motivating users to adopt AI.

Ethical considerations are paramount. AI interpretability ensures that decisions can be audited and traced, avoiding legal and ethical problems. For instance, in 2020, a facial recognition system led to a wrongful arrest due to a lack of interpretability. Ethical guidelines for AI, such as the EU’s GDPR, emphasize the importance of explainability.

Challenges to AI Interpretability

  • Balancing Predictive and Descriptive Accuracy: One major challenge in achieving AI interpretability is balancing predictive and descriptive accuracy. Simplifying models to improve interpretability can sometimes reduce their predictive accuracy. This trade-off requires careful consideration in AI system design.
  • Ensuring Global and Local Interpretability: Global interpretability ensures that the overall model is unbiased and learning the correct objectives. Local interpretability ensures that individual predictions are actionable and sensible. Different use cases, such as anti-money laundering and precision medicine, have unique needs that must be addressed.

Approaches to Enhancing AI Interpretability

Enhancing the interpretability of AI models is essential to address the challenges posed by the black box phenomenon. Various approaches can be employed to achieve this, broadly categorized into model-based approaches and post-hoc approaches.

1. Model-Based Approaches

Model-based approaches focus on improving the interpretability of the AI model itself. These methods often involve using simpler models and incorporating domain-specific rules to enhance transparency.

Favoring Simpler Models

Simpler models, such as linear regression and tree-based models, are inherently more interpretable. These models are easier to understand and explain, making them suitable for applications where transparency is critical.

  • Linear Regression: Linear regression models are straightforward, providing clear insights into how each feature impacts the outcome. They are particularly useful in scenarios where the relationship between variables is linear.
  • Tree-Based Models: Decision trees, random forests, and gradient-boosted trees are more interpretable than complex deep learning models. They offer visual representations of decision paths, making it easier to trace how predictions are made.

Using Domain-Specific and Business-Driven Rules

Incorporating domain knowledge and business rules into AI models enhances their interpretability. By leveraging expert knowledge, models can be designed to align with real-world expectations and constraints.

  • Predictive Maintenance: In predictive maintenance applications, tree-based models can be used to predict equipment failures. For example, gradient-boosted trees can analyze maintenance logs and sensor data to identify potential failures. The interpretability of these models allows maintainers to troubleshoot and prioritize maintenance effectively, reducing downtime and improving operational efficiency.
  • Supply Chain Optimization: In supply chain optimization, domain-specific rules help improve model performance while maintaining interpretability. For instance, by using features such as time-since-last-maintenance or average turbine speed, models can provide actionable insights. Simulation-based optimization approaches can consider various uncertainty factors, ensuring robust and interpretable solutions.

2. Post-Hoc Approaches

Post-hoc approaches focus on explaining the predictions of complex models after they have been made. These methods do not alter the underlying model but provide interpretability by analyzing the model’s behavior.

Generating Feature Contributions

Post-hoc interpretability frameworks generate feature contributions to explain model predictions. These contributions help users understand which features influenced the predictions and to what extent.

  • TreeInterpreter: TreeInterpreter is a framework that focuses on tree-based models, such as random forests. It decomposes decision trees into decision paths, making it straightforward to interpret the model’s output. For example, in a predictive maintenance application for detecting boiler leakages, TreeInterpreter can localize potential leakages by analyzing the feature contributions of sound intensities from microphone sensors.
  • ELI5 (Explain Like I’m 5): ELI5 is a versatile interpretability framework that supports various machine learning libraries, including scikit-learn, XGBoost, and LightGBM. In financial services, ELI5 can be used to detect and prevent money laundering by providing prediction-level insights. By aggregating individual feature contributions into meaningful categories, ELI5 helps compliance investigators make informed decisions about client risk.
  • SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations): SHAP is a general approach that explains predictions by calculating the contribution of each feature. In a securities lending application, SHAP can predict which securities will be shorted by clients, increasing inventory visibility and boosting revenue. The feature contributions provided by SHAP help build confidence in the model among trading desk personnel.

3. Consistent API for Interpretability

These interpretability frameworks offer a consistent API, making it easier for users to integrate and utilize them. This consistency enhances flexibility, allowing users to choose the most appropriate tool for their specific needs.

  • Flexibility: Users can switch between different interpretability frameworks without worrying about specific interfaces or custom code. This flexibility is particularly useful in environments where multiple models and use cases are present.
  • Ease of Use: A single API simplifies the process of interpreting model predictions, reducing the learning curve and increasing adoption among non-technical users.


In conclusion, enhancing AI interpretability is crucial for mitigating the risks associated with black box AI systems. Interpretable AI provides clarity, builds trust, generates new insights, and ensures ethical practices. By addressing key issues and overcoming challenges, organizations can leverage interpretable AI to drive better business outcomes and foster user adoption.

Scroll to Top